<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not as adjunct or auxiliary or in any way lesser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lillowen.com/2009/01/20/not-as-adjunct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lillowen.com/2009/01/20/not-as-adjunct/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 03:37:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://lillowen.com/2009/01/20/not-as-adjunct/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lillowen.com/?p=27#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I totally get what you&#039;re saying about one step closer, but it still makes me sad and sick that baby steps is still the best we can hope for, you know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally get what you&#8217;re saying about one step closer, but it still makes me sad and sick that baby steps is still the best we can hope for, you know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misha</title>
		<link>http://lillowen.com/2009/01/20/not-as-adjunct/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Misha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lillowen.com/?p=27#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Well, that&#039;s encouraging. But as far as history being made, it&#039;s always been the case that men of all types get their rights before the women of the majority. Just look at the Person&#039;s Case of the early 1900&#039;s. 
Maybe we have to look at is as one step closer to total gender equality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s encouraging. But as far as history being made, it&#8217;s always been the case that men of all types get their rights before the women of the majority. Just look at the Person&#8217;s Case of the early 1900&#8242;s.<br />
Maybe we have to look at is as one step closer to total gender equality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

